Dots Connect To White House Malfeasance

Attorney General Loretta Lynch says love will cure the jihadist’s and we will all be safer in her rose-colored glasses she apparently sees the world through.  Photo credit:

In Disconnecting the Dots, Patrick Dunleavy says that by removing the descriptive words of our enemy, “Islamic terrorists”, we blur the lines that connect the dots to clearly identify who the enemy is and to better fight them that way.

He writes,

When the current administration removes the words “radical Islamic terrorism” from the equation, it is more than a semantic faux pas. It is an intentional erasure of one of the dots necessary to see clearly the threat facing the United States. It identifies who has declared war on us.

He points out that in the fifteen years since 9/11, the supplemental report by the 9/11 Commission reported that Islamist terrorism has gotten even stronger.  That should spell danger to the White House’s Administration.

Yet recently, the Attorney General’s office reportedly seems to think that with a little love toward these jihadist’s, we will all be safer:

Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that love and compassion are the best responses to terrorism during remarks to the media in Orlando, Florida on Tuesday, according to David Rutz, of The Washington Free Beacon (June 21, 2016).  [Source.]

Who needs a White House and Attorney General who are supposed to help keep the public safe would throw the enemy a bone and tell them, essentially; “We will love you until you change your ways against us”.  

Can you imagine a battered woman telling her batterer husband that she will keep loving him no matter if he kills her?  Is this White House saying he doesn’t mind if United States citizens get wiped out by these murderous warriors against the United States and the whole of western civilization, let alone the rest of the world?


CAIR Uses Deceptive Tactics to Overcome the Western World

The Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD), Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, has cited the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as being a front for terrorist group HAMAS.  

He narrates a video clip by the Clarion Project (below) showing why we ought to give CAIR the boot right out of this country because of their support of terrorism, right under our noses.  

The Third Jihad – CAIR, Muslim Brotherhood and Jihad – Published on Mar 7, 2016

The video discusses how Muslim jihadist’s use deception as a part of their war against the western civilization.  He cites a secret document, a manifesto of jihad, that was uncovered by the FBI describing their war: 

…their work in america is a kind of a grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the western civilization from within.

Jasser starts out this video clip by saying;  

And Americans are being told that many of the mainstream Muslims are also moderate. One of their primary tactics is deception.

On it’s website, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) condemns Al-Queda, but won’t condemn Hamas and Hezbollah.  The author tells us why.  

At 3:53 minutes into the video, Jasser says;

In 1994 CAIR was established by three of the leaders from the IAP (screen shot of Omar Ahmad, Rafiq Jaber and Nihad Awad) and it’s well documented that the IAP was essentially a front group for HAMAS. So perhaps that would explain why CAIR won’t condemn terror groups like Hamas and also why they avoided participating in my Muslims against terror rally in 2004.

Why won’t we wake up to the jihad that lies quietly dormant while the terrorist-supporting organizations still live and work in the United States?

The CAIR-type organizations that have a history of supporting the terrorists still being protected, as if having the right to form nonprofits gives them some special protection against the United States coming after them, makes a special point that the Obama Administration is a terrorist cover-up White House.  We must get rid of them.  Our country needs to be kept safe.


Muslim Islam Yada yada wuzza wuzza: LOL!

Did you see the video of the Imam telling his audience that non-muslims are filthy and not worth anything, during their jihad?

The subtitles are hilarious interspersed with the vile meanderings of the non-Profit, no, not that kind of nonprofit, as in 501 (c) 3, the business model.

It is the ramblings of a non-Islamic Prophet that we don’t want to hear anyway.

I think the subtitles in parenthesis are the most truthful part of his video.

Come with me on a journey to hell by listening to this and believing every word.  

This is a man from hell who is into killing and murder of innocent persons, and he has a PhD in this s#it!


A War Crimes Criminal Living In The United States Works As A Dulles International Airport Security Guard

Is the U.S. this lax?

I mean, a Muslim war criminal from Somalia has been working as a security guard at Dulles International Airport, in Washington, D.C.

He got kicked out of Canada, once his history became known, but he found refuge in a place in America, near our nation’s capital. I wonder if he knows our President that that happened?  Just wondering…  The city he lives in is Alexandria, Virginia.

Yusuf Abdi Ali, age 63, is being accused of shooting and leaving a man for dead as a military commander during the barbarous civil war in Somalia.

A civil law suit is brought against him for being a war criminal and because, according to CNN, the suit alleges that he “tortured and attempted to murder the plaintiff“.

He lives with his wife, who lied to get into the United States, claiming to be a refugee from that same civil war, and who married Ali, according to

Ali has been in the U.S. for 20 years, according to a CNN report.

It took a CNN reporter who informed the security company of his war crimes history before he was put on Administrative leave.

According to ABC News

Officials with Master Security, a contractor that provides security guards to the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA), told ABC News they were not aware of the pending civil litigation against their employee until Tuesday, but have now placed Ali on paid administrative leave while they investigate.

Video credit: CNN

Other sources:  and 


Seventh Century Anti-Islamophobic Rhetoric

An anti-Islamophobia event hosts a panel of speakers, one of whom is a prominent college professor at Florida Atlantic University who discusses the “rationality” behind a seventh-century punishment of cutting off a person’s hands for stealing.  

Recorded on video, the professor explains the vicious punishment of Sharia law that is supposed to prevent Muslims from stealing.

They begin to weigh and balance judgment from the place of killing people as an acceptable way of punishment.  Their judgment seems to start at death, as if every crime is punishable by death, so thief’s ought to be happy that they only get their hands cut off.  They get to keep their lives and so it is a better sentence because they get to live for a crime such as stealing.

So in trying to get this straight, the thinking is, that instead of killing people who rob and steal, it is better to cut their hands off.  By cutting off their hands, the robbers and thief’s lives are compassionately spared.  We are supposed to see this backwards logic as if it were more humane, more humane than actually killing them.  As if cutting off body parts in judgment of a person who committed a crime could ever be humane.

Apparently such severe torture is supposed to deter Muslims from stealing, yet how has this form of punishment worked for them?  Why is this still their law if it is supposed to create a fearful example to Muslims and make them never want to steal, or get caught stealing?  It doesn’t work or they wouldn’t need this law.  It would have solved the problem the first time.

It is more a barbaric statement about who they are at the core, to see this as a humane way of punishing someone.  The problem is, there is nothing human, or humane, about Sharia law.  

The law forces down people’s throats a very brutal, primitive lifestyle, one that has never progressed beyond a seventh century caveman mentality that view people as animals to be slaughtered, and the people are seen as never amounting to any value at all.

My perspective is that it is a self-fulfilling prophecy that they will exist but only by barbarism because they can’t think of a way to survive and risk being found out as being the flunkies of the world that they are among regular people on earth.

I see it as being that these people pushing Sharia law on us don’t know how to live among friendly people and they refuse to civilly cohabitate on the earth with the human race.  If they can’t have what others have they must steal what they can and subjugate people, senselessly murder people, trampling their way across other people’s lands to try and take it from them, like rejects at birth.  No one wants to play that way.  As children who grew up to be cruel to animals, Sharia law adherants will try and take away things that aren’t theirs, bully and scream until they dominate people who will give up fighting them off.  Making nice with people like this won’t work; they never learn how to be civil and aren’t interested in becoming so.  They want to rob and kill and according to Christian belief, this is what Satan does: he comes to kill, steal and destroy.

The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.” – John 10:10  (KJV)   

Don’t you think you ought to protect yourself against these people and not make a way clear for these people to enter in our lands to take from us what it is that we hold dear?

Safety for one, is what most people hold dear.  We trust that in the United States we will be held accountable for our actions and so that helps dispel the criminal elements in our cities and towns.

But Sharia law cuts the hands off of their people who rob and steal so they can walk around in public without their hands, supposedly as an example of what will happen if you have possibly be found guilty of stealing.  That ought to be enough to keep those people in line; after all, without hands they can never do anything bad again.  Next time, if they try stealing they may get their arms cut off, or be killed since they had a warning.

What mentality thinks this way?

My feeling is that these are small minded rejects who can only “win” at anything by displaying their barbaric pride, and seeing people die.

Brigitte Gabriel’s Words to a Muslim Student

You know that wonderful, fantastic lady who educates us so well on Islam?  Brigitte Gabriel, who I found captivating in her fire-brand tone of speaking against Muslim aggression in the United States in a video of her talking to a Muslim student.

I was so taken by her forthright and thoughtful answer to the young lady about how a small percentage of Muslims could be such a problem in the world today because of their sheer numbers, she opened my eyes to the problem of Islamic extremists in our country and how radicalized they are.

I went to the library and checked out her book, “They Must Be Stopped: Why we must defeat radical Islam and how we can do it” (2009) and started reading.  

I want to write thoughts I have while I read her fantastic book.

I expect her writing to be fantastic, just as her speaking is.